Explore Repolve

REPOLVE RESEARCH / 02

Do You Need to Train to Failure for Muscle Growth?

That last grinding rep feels important. The growth payoff is less certain.

THE SHORT ANSWER

In one small study, stopping one or two reps short produced similar average quadriceps growth to reaching failure, with less acute neuromuscular fatigue.

What did the research find?

Eighteen resistance-trained adults completed eight weeks of twice-weekly lower-body training. Each participant trained one leg to failure and the other with reps in reserve: two on the leg press and one on the leg extension. Average quadriceps growth was similar. Failure produced greater repetition and lifting-velocity losses, markers of acute neuromuscular fatigue.

Refalo et al. (2024). Similar muscle hypertrophy following eight weeks of resistance training to momentary muscular failure or with repetitions-in-reserve in resistance-trained individuals. Journal of Sports Sciences.

What this does not prove

This was a small, within-person, lower-body experiment. It does not establish an optimum effort level for every exercise, person or training phase. Similar averages are not a guarantee of identical individual results, and greater acute fatigue is not the same claim as greater injury risk.

What does training to failure mean?

Momentary muscular failure is the point where you cannot finish another repetition with the prescribed movement. Reps in reserve, often shortened to RIR, is your estimate of how many more good reps you could complete. Two RIR means you think two remain. It is an estimate, not a laboratory measurement.

Close to failure still means a hard set

The comparison here was failure versus a small number of reps remaining. It was not failure versus stopping as soon as the exercise became uncomfortable. The result cannot tell us that any easy set will produce the same outcome.

How to use the finding in your workout log

Write down what you completed and your best estimate of remaining reps. Keep the standard for a good rep consistent. Over time, look at whether performance remains repeatable across sets and sessions. That record is more informative than treating the most dramatic final rep as the only one that matters.

Do you have to avoid failure completely?

That is not what this study tested. The useful question is whether reaching failure serves the purpose of a particular set in your program. The findings challenge the idea that every set must end in failure to count; they do not make failure universally useless.

PUT IT IN YOUR LOG

Give your next workout some context.

Repolve helps you log sets, reps and weights, then follow your strength progress over time. Supported exercises contribute to a personalized Strength Profile and an overall Strength Score—estimates of logged strength performance, not measurements of muscle growth.

Get Repolve for iPhone ↗

See how Repolve works · Android waitlist

Video transcript

You're fighting for that last rep like your gains depend on it. They might not. In one eight-week study, eighteen trained lifters took one leg to failure, and stopped the other one or two reps short. Both legs grew similarly. But training to failure caused more fatigue. More grind. No clear growth bonus in this study. Train hard. Get close. But you don't have to fail every set to make it count. Repolve. Less guesswork. Better training.

Source & editorial note

Refalo et al. (2024). Similar muscle hypertrophy following eight weeks of resistance training to momentary muscular failure or with repetitions-in-reserve in resistance-trained individuals. Journal of Sports Sciences.

Repolve Research explains published exercise science and connects it to workout tracking. This is an editorial summary by the team behind Repolve, not a new study or an independent review of the app. Practical examples are illustrations, not tested results. Report a correction.

KEEP EXPLORING